Article Tools

Print | Email | Bookmark and Share

Wrigley says so long to foil wrappers for iconic brands

Among the first to use foil wrappers for its chewing gum, Wrigley makes a switch to paper for five brands to save 850 tons of aluminum per year.

wrigley.jpgWm. Wrigley Jr. Co. has announced plans to replace the foil wrappers for five of its most popular chewing gum brands with a paper alternative, The Chicago Sun-Times reports. The company was among the first to use the aluminum-based packaging for stick gum nearly 100 years ago.

Wrigley says the switch is expected to save nearly 850 tons of aluminum per year, keeping the equivalent of 60 million cans out of landfills annually. The cost of the paper packaging versus foil is said to be 13% less, while providing the same shelf life and barrier properties.

Notes an article on FoodProductionDaily.com however, “industry analysts may be perplexed as to the clear cut environmental benefits of the swap from foil wraps to paper by Wrigley as aluminum is known to be one of the easiest and most commonly recycled packaging materials.”

Wrigley says it plans to keep the silver foil wrappers on its Extra brand gum and the colored foil wrappers on its 5 brand.

The initiative is part of Wrigley’s global sustainability commitment, which includes the use of new materials and designs to reduce the impact of its packaging materials. Earlier innovations include the company’s Bottle Pack, which reduces packaging by 20% versus blister packs, and a slim, 15-stick carton that cuts package material use compared with the previous foil-and-film wrap packages.

Comments: 4

heloo....
Im mehrjoo for kalapack

I am puzzled as to why any industry analyst worthy of the name would have any confusion about this initiative. Sure, aluminum in can form is highly recyclable and highly recycled. But the foil laminate wrappers we're talking about here are hard to recycle and there is no practical way to do so at the consumer level. Thus the tremendous amount of energy & GHG it takes to refine bauxite (aluminum ore) is tossed away with every wrapper. A switch to a less CO2-intensive material is really a no-brainer as long as the gum is still well-protected.

I think is better solution but is the material by recycled paper?

Once the plastic wrapper is removed, after a week or so, the sticks of gum become brittle and break into pieces.
Not a product you would offer someone for an after dinner breath freshener.

Post new comment

Already a member of this site? Log in first before you post!
The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • You may use [inline:xx] tags to display uploaded files or images inline.

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
1 + 0 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.

* indicates an article that was submitted directly to this Web site by the supplier, and was not handled by the Greener Package editorial staff.

Greener Package may share your contact information with our sponsors, as detailed in our Privacy Policy. Greener Package will not share your information with a sponsor whose content you have not reviewed. The members of the Advisory Board and Expert Network do not review, approve or endorse advertisements on this Web site.