Article Tools

Print | Email | Bookmark and Share

Mayors’ conference adopts Producer Responsibility Resolution

Extended Producer Responsibility for product and packaging waste is supported by the U.S. Conference of Mayors at their annual meeting.

blue.jpgThe U.S. Conference of Mayors (USCM) today adopted a resolution calling for state and federal responsibility legislation that shifts the costs of managing problematic product and packaging waste away from taxpayers and local governments to producers and the consumers of their products.

The USCM resolution is based on a model developed by the Product Policy Institute (PPI) that has been adopted by 95 local jurisdictions and local government associations in California since 2006, as well as by jurisdictions in New York, Massachusetts, Minnesota, and Texas. USCM is the third national association of elected officials to adopt resolutions to address the growing, expensive problem of managing consumer product waste, which USCM says is part of a larger movement sweeping the nation.

“Product Policy Institute has been working with governments for seven years to find solutions to the mounting burden of product and packaging waste facing communities,” says Product Policy Institute executive director Bill Sheehan. “Today the U.S. Conference of Mayors planted their flag in the waste pile and said, ‘No more.’ They asked product manufacturers to take primary responsibility for their toxic and nonrecyclable products. We’re proud of their leadership on this pressing issue.”

USCM is the official nonpartisan organization of cities with populations of 30,000 or more, promoting effective national urban/suburban policy. The USCM resolution supports state and federal producer responsibility legislation that levels the playing field for corporations that take “cradle-to-cradle” responsibility for their products and packaging, and urges Congress to support the ability of state governments to establish producer responsibility legislation.

The USCM resolution lead sponsor was Mayor Christopher Cabaldon of West Sacramento, CA, whose city adopted a similar resolution in 2009. The list of signers included five U.S. states:

• Christopher Cabaldon, Mayor of West Sacramento, CA
• Mike McGinn, Mayor of Seattle, WA
• David Maher, Mayor of Cambridge, MA
• Patrick Hayes, Mayor of North Little Rock, AR
• Mark Burroughs, Mayor of Denton, TX
• Kevin Johnson, Mayor of Sacramento, CA

“Local governments are in serious financial trouble and can better use resources currently going to manage waste products like batteries, needles, and fluorescent lamps to fund police, fire, and basic public health services,” says Mayor Cabaldon. “We need manufacturers to take responsibility for what they make, not leave it to the taxpayers and ratepayers to clean up the mess at very high costs.

National associations of elected officials representing cities and counties have already adopted producer responsibility resolutions. The National League of Cities and the National Association of Counties both adopted resolutions last year.

The resolutions are part of a movement that calls for Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR), also known as Product Stewardship. EPR is a policy approach common in Europe, Japan, Canada, and other industrialized nations but relatively new to the U.S. In the U.S., 22 states now have laws for discarded electronic products that require producers to finance or manage collection and provide responsible recycling.

“We cannot continue to expect government and taxpayers to design, fund, and manage every product sold,” says Heidi Sanborn, executive director of the California Product Stewardship Council. Taxpayers and garbage ratepayers have hit their limit and so have our landfills! Requiring producers of problem products like batteries and fluorescent lamps to pay for their recovery utilizes free-market competitive forces to drive down recycling costs and creates jobs in the private sector, not in the public sector.”

* indicates an article that was submitted directly to this Web site by the supplier, and was not handled by the Greener Package editorial staff.

Greener Package may share your contact information with our sponsors, as detailed in our Privacy Policy. Greener Package will not share your information with a sponsor whose content you have not reviewed. The members of the Advisory Board and Expert Network do not review, approve or endorse advertisements on this Web site.

Don’t miss intelligence crucial to your job and business!
Click on any newsletter to view a sample. Enter your email address below to sign up!
PACKAGE DESIGN/
DEVELOPMENT

Greener Package

Sustainable packaging

Shelf Impact

Package design strategies

SPECIAL INTEREST
GENERAL INTEREST

New Issue Alert

Packaging World Magazine

eClip

Breaking packaging news

Packaging Insights

Pertinent packaging issues

PACK EXPO
Each newsletter ranges in frequency from once per month to a few times per month at most.
Email: