Canadian spring-water company takes the 100% rPET plunge
- Filed in:
- Bottles,
- Recycled content,
- Beverage
In harmony with its stated company philosophy – “To offer natural spring water of exceptional quality while minimizing our environmental footprint” – Naya Waters, Inc. of Mirabel, Quebec, Canada, has become the first still-water provider to offer its product in bottles made from 100% recycled PET (rPET). The Dec. 1 launch is the result of seven years of research and development, Naya president Daniel Cotte told GreenerPackage.com on the day of the debut. “What we are doing today is a very significant step toward setting and reaching tangible goals,” he said.
The first Naya Natural Spring Water product to be offered in 100% rPET is the 1.5-L size, available in New York City. Cotte says the company plans to have switched all five of its bottle sizes, distributed within Canada and New York City, to the new material by the end of January.
Naya is one of several new packages making their debut this year in 100% rPET. Others include the Naked Juice reNEWabottle for juice beverages, and a clamshell from Earthbound Farms for its organic, fresh-cut salad.
For Naya, the transformation to 100% recycled content was gradual, Cotte explained. The company first moved to a 25% rPET bottle in 2008, followed by a 50% rPET package. The main challenges to executing a 100% rPET bottle, Cotte said, related to manufacturing, cost, and container-quality issues. “It’s quite a technical challenge to blow bottles with 100 percent-recycled PET and to deliver a bottle that is going to be consistent in terms of color and shape,” he said. “The biggest challenge though was safety – to make sure that weren’t taking any risks with having some substance in the containers.”
R&D for each bottle iteration involved nine-month data-gathering process to ensure the bottle’s safety. “We had an extremely stringent, tough quality protocol at each of the stages in the journey,” Cotte relates.
Naya’s comprehensive testing of the bottle also included a Life Cycle Analysis, which revealed a 30% decrease in the carbon footprint of the 1.5-L bottle size versus one made with virgin PET. Cotte told GreenerPackage.com that Naya is the first Canadian company to have its carbon footprint certified by the Carbon Trust.
Laying off the landfill
One of the significant advantages of the new 100% rPET bottle, Cotte told GreenerPackage.com, is the fact that it will reduce waste going to landfill. Recycled PET, he explained, can be used indefinitely until the total recycling stream reaches 50 percent virgin material – a long way off, considering the U.S.’s 27% PET recycling rate.
For this project, Cotte said Naya has secured a supply of rPET to meet its needs. “At the same time, we believe that by putting this packaging on the market, we are helping to create an awareness behind recycling,” he added.
The company has also said it plans to implement programs to help collection efforts and to create a permanent recycling loop in conjunction with some proprietary rPET manufacturers. At present, rPET is more expensive than virgin materials – a cost that Cotte said Naya took on in order to meet its environmental targets.
“This is definitely the vision that we have and the hope that we have,” Cotte concluded. “We have been extremely committed moving through this journey, so today is a big day for us.”
* indicates an article that was submitted directly to this Web site by the supplier, and was not handled by the Greener Package editorial staff.
Greener Package may share your contact information with our sponsors, as detailed in our Privacy Policy. Greener Package will not share your information with a sponsor whose content you have not reviewed. The members of the Advisory Board and Expert Network do not review, approve or endorse advertisements on this Web site.
First of all, kudos to Naya's commitment to sustainability as manifest through it opting to pay MORE for recycled material than virgin.
Quick question though: How was "30% decrease in the carbon footprint" determined? The article mentions a LCA, but what, and which metrics were used? Does this mean a reduction in GHG emissions or a decreased reliance on fossil fuel consumption?
Second, the article states, "PET...can be used indefinitely until the total recycling stream reaches 50% virgin material." What does this mean and why?
In response to Chandler's above inquiries, Naya contacted me with the following inforamtion:
How was "30% decrease in the carbon footprint" determined? The article mentions a LCA, but what, and which metrics were used? Does this mean a reduction in GHG emissions or a decreased reliance on fossil fuel consumption?
Full life cycle analysis (including a standard logistic pattern) calculated with a methodology developed with the Carbon Trust gave the following results, certified by the Carbon Trust:
1.5L with 100% virgin plastic: 196.6 g of CO2 per bottle
1.5L with 100% rPET: 138.1g of CO2 per bottle, i.e 30% less
Second, the article states, "PET...can be used indefinitely until the total recycling stream reaches 50% virgin material." What does this mean and why?
PET can be recycled indefinitely as long as there is always 50% virgin material in the recycling stream. This means that there is no issue up to 50% of all the PET bottles with 100% rPET, and we are very far from it, today the recycled content in the recycling stream is below 5%. We have 4 or 5 years ahead of us and we are already working on the next generation of rPET to allow indefinite recycling, without any virgin material in the stream.
Post new comment