![]() | Michael StephensUsername: MF Stephens |
Location
Hereford, Herefordshire, United Kingdom
Role
ConsultantJob Title
Technical DirectorCompany
Symphony Environmental LtdProfile
Expert in design, manufacture and testing of biodegradable and oxo-biodegradable materials.
Comments
* indicates an article that was submitted directly to this Web site by the supplier, and was not handled by the Greener Package editorial staff.
Greener Package may share your contact information with our sponsors, as detailed in our Privacy Policy. Greener Package will not share your information with a sponsor whose content you have not reviewed. The members of the Advisory Board and Expert Network do not review, approve or endorse advertisements on this Web site.









PET oxo-biodegradation
Dear Sammysam, I agree in part with the comments of Alexis Stassinopoulos. There is lttle evidence of successful oxidative induced degradation of PET. The oxo-biotechnology has many papers and test documents that verify biodegradation of polyethylene and polypropylene. These are simple hydrocarbons and work well for oxo' technology applications. Howeve, the complex nature of a polyester like PET is a different kettle of fish. We are working on it -but it is not easy. Where I differ with Alex is in regards to definitions of biodegradation. The hydro- degradable industry has successfully lobbied to get the term compostable synonymous with biodegradabilty. This is not the case, in fact items such as leaves and wood and paper ( considered biodegradable) could not comply with ASTM 6400. The test method in 6400 is designed for industrial composting -nothing else. The consequeces of marine or field pollution are not addressed. Virtually all 6400 compliant polymers will not degrade outside of a highly active compost environment. Oxo-biodegradable materials- albeit much slower- will biodegrade anywhere oxygen is present. Surely it is better to share the inevitable carbon conversion between atmosphere and micro-organisms in the bio-background. Carbon14 labelling tests have verified this process. Converting to 90% CO2 is the equivalent of burning in my view and should not be regarded as recovery - and hence recycling. When, and if, we succeed in developing a viable ( realsitic time frame) biodegradable PET - rest assured we will let you know. regards Michael