CA judge blocks styrene from being labeled a carcinogen
- Filed in:
- Thermoformed packaging,
- Material health,
- Beverage,
- Food
An article last week by Jill Replogle,
special to the California Progress Report, reported that a Sacramento, CA, Superior Court judge has blocked the state from declaring that a chemical widely used in plastic food packaging is a carcinogen.
On Aug.12, Judge Shelleyanne W.L. Chang affirmed a tentative ruling granting a preliminary injunction on behalf of styrene manufacturers, who sued to keep state environmental regulators from listing styrene as a cancer-causing substance under provisions of Proposition 65. The 1986 initiative seeks to regulate and notify consumers about toxic products.
The judge wrote in her tentative ruling that she agreed with the plaintiff, the Styrene Research and Information Center (SIRC), that it is likely to prevail in its lawsuit against the state and that “the designation of a product as a carcinogen, particularly one associated with food, could have a devastating effect on that product's use.”
The industry lawsuit was filed in late July against the state and its Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment to block the regulators from listing styrene under Proposition 65. Styrene is used in hundreds of products, including bicycle helmets, plastic food containers and boat parts.
The styrene industry argues there’s not sufficient evidence that styrene causes cancer in humans. “It’s not a carcinogen,” said Gene Livingston, a Sacramento lawyer for SIRC. He said evidence to the contrary is “based on limited animal data.”
* indicates an article that was submitted directly to this Web site by the supplier, and was not handled by the Greener Package editorial staff.
Greener Package may share your contact information with our sponsors, as detailed in our Privacy Policy. Greener Package will not share your information with a sponsor whose content you have not reviewed. The members of the Advisory Board and Expert Network do not review, approve or endorse advertisements on this Web site.
In general, the plastic is very harmful to the environment because it decomposes within a few hundred years!
Options exist!
Airliners by Coldpack replace expanded polystyrene foam using a patented baffled structure. With 65% of the carbon footprint and half the environmental impact, it's a great choice for shipments of perishable goods.
More at www.coldpack.com or by viewing this segment of Greg Gumbel's "Eye on America" series on innovative American companies.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=soGJ3MQfUPk
Worth the five minutes to check it out if you use EPS foam.
Plastic doesn't decompose completely; it breaks down into smaller pieces, which can end up being more invasive. Plastic is not the answer it is the disease.
Post new comment