Article Tools

Print | Email | Bookmark and Share

Any indicators to exhibit packaging design sources optimization?

kittw04

kittw04

Role: Designer

As from the consumer trends around the world is going towards more retail pack sizes due to the smaller family and fast going of the population, yet this consumer requirements trend would be opposite to the environmental and packaging waste concerns. Also, when dealing with retail pack sizes, the more packaging levels can be involved leading to higher packaging waste per net weight of product.

Learning from Waste and Resourses Action Program (WRAP) in the EU that they have gathered the Best-In-Class (BIC) of packaging systems related to various product types. The information of the packaging weight used per net weight of product available in the markets are grouped. However, it could not be found the detail packaging system to be compared.

How can we, as the packaging designers, optimize or balance out the said 2 opposite directions during the packaging development of a new product launch? Would there be any indicators to tell us if such packaging system is considered to be readily optimized upon its first launch?

Posted March 16, 2009

Comments: 2

Any indicators to exhibit packaging design sources optimization?

Noer

Noer

Product Design Manager, Superfos
Location: Taastrup, Denmark
Role: Designer

I believe WRAP is doing a great job in trying to make us all understand how we can deal with these complex matters.

But I am reluctant to the thought of one common mindset among customers. Even though argued in the book "Creative Man" by the Danish Institute of Future studies, that the creative individuals actually share a lot common habits and are not that individual after all, I do not believe in a complete unified best-in-class roll out.
Consumers want to be treated individually. We learned that at the market place a long time ago, and now we want to get the same service in retail. That is a great challenge – also to the packaging designers.

So, even if we do not strive for a “one size fits all”, there is a lot to. Take a look at the shelves! A lot of products could go into more sustainable packaging without making great science of it. That is what they are finally working on in the UK. To get rid of all the excessive packaging and reduce complexity is a major task. And this at least is an area where the packaging designers and marketing departments have their great share!

Moreover it is not necessarily the packaging itself that is the problem. General food waste deriving from extended shelf life or damaged food is a major problem which also relates to the supply chain – the whole purchasing setup. And that is a hard nut to crack!

I believe that technology will allow us to create personalised, attractive & sustainable packaging solutions over time. And while waiting for the technology to arise, we can only do our best to let the packaging design help reduce the food waste.

Posted March 17, 2009

Food Grade vs. Non Food Grade Printing Ink

kittw04

kittw04

Role: Designer

Could you advise what specific criteria is used to differentiate between food grade and non-food grade printing inks? For example, are there any heavy metal levels or any solvent limits? Is the criteria used a worldwide or global standard?

Also, for those toluene-based printing inks, are there any regulated residual solvent limits for food packaging? Many thanks.

Posted May 27, 2009

Post new comment

Already a member of this site? Log in first before you post!
The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • You may use [inline:xx] tags to display uploaded files or images inline.

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
10 + 3 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.

* indicates an article that was submitted directly to this Web site by the supplier, and was not handled by the Greener Package editorial staff.

Greener Package may share your contact information with our sponsors, as detailed in our Privacy Policy. Greener Package will not share your information with a sponsor whose content you have not reviewed. The members of the Advisory Board and Expert Network do not review, approve or endorse advertisements on this Web site.