Self-regulation of bioplastics claims
- Filed in:
- Bags & pouches,
- Blisters & clamshells,
- Bottles,
- Containers, rigid,
- Flexible packaging,
- Resins,
- Thermoformed packaging,
- Trays,
- Bioplastics,
- Compost & Biodegrade,
- Recycling,
- Renewable resources,
- Source reduction,
- Recycled content,
- Certifications,
- Green resources,
- Green marketing,
- Metrics, standards, and LCA,
- Beverage,
- Food,
- Non-food,
- Personal care,
- Pharmaceutical
How much self-regulation should the supplier and user industries exercise regarding bioplastics, particularly claims of "compostable" and "biodegradable?" There is wiggle room---if one is so inclined---to use those claims self-servingly. At what point, however, do such liberties engender consumer mistrust and regulatory tightening?
* indicates an article that was submitted directly to this Web site by the supplier, and was not handled by the Greener Package editorial staff.
Greener Package may share your contact information with our sponsors, as detailed in our Privacy Policy. Greener Package will not share your information with a sponsor whose content you have not reviewed. The members of the Advisory Board and Expert Network do not review, approve or endorse advertisements on this Web site.
Self Regulation
Thomas Oris
We already see how the industry has used "biodegradable" to promote its product, a clear case of Green washing. In many instances, products take literally decades to biodegrade. While the product may meet the technical definition of biodegradable, from a consumer standpoint biodegradable is normally translated into a timeframe of months, perhaps a year or two, but not decades. I believe their are specific definitions regarding compostable claims which makes it more difficult to "wiggle". Overall, biodegradable claims tend to be misleading to consumers based on the consumer’s definition of the term "biodegradable".
Therefore, I would strongly recommend that some form independent regulation be established. Otherwise, it threatens the fundamental principles and credibility of sustainable packaging.
Claims misuse
Timothy Bohrer
Claim misuse will always be a problem at early stages of usage, and in the case of compostable and biodegradable claims, there is a fair amount of confusion in the US, even though clear standards for testing do exist.
ASTM D6400-04 Standard specification for compostable plastics
ASTM D6863-03 Standard specification for biodegradable plastics used as coatings on paper or other compostable substrates
ASTM 5338 Standard test method for determining aerobic biodegradability of plastic material under controlled composting conditions
Materials passing these standards should biodegrade suitably in actively managed composting operations.
Europe handles it a bit different, with classifications for compatibility with managed composting, backyard composting or biodegradability performance for litter.
My view is that just as any other property of a material that we might specify is only meaningful in the context of quantified performance against a specific test (think tear resistance of a film, where conditions and specific test method are required for someone to understand what the reported number means), claims about degradability performance must be specific to a standard and method.
Only by holding ourselves to rigor in these claims can credibility be maintained. I'm inclined to believe that self-regulation won't be sufficient, given the tendency of some companies to exaggerate and there will be some labeling guidelines at least for on-pack claims. Users of these material and packages should demand specifics from suppliers before giving any credence to claims.
Self-regulation of bioplastics claims
sean sabre
Hello Sterling
Great topic ...
Personally I would like to see the FTC take leadership here as self-governance does not always translate into due diligence. They seem to be johnny on the spot when it comes to textiles labeling or country of origin marking but until we transition *FROM* a government that only enforces communication protocol that harms people or reduces risk to revenue at the Treasury *TO* a government that places more emphasis on corporate citizenship and environmental liability, I don't think there will be any formal deterrents in the marketplace along this front. Maybe watchdog groups will fill in the gap but I can tell you from my experience that the lack of understanding is pervasive. Not only are the marketing organizations and designers wanting but I have had sales execs from film and resin suppliers in my office selling their product not understanding the difference between additive based oxo/photo and bio-degradability much less compostability. You picked a hot one.
Regards
Sean
Post new comment